Skip to content

Month: March 2024

Vocabulary

A good vocabulary increases successful communication. It makes it more efficient and sophisticated. Picking the right word cuts down on wordiness. It is thus economical. Things read more authoritatively and thereby it psychologically adds persuasive ethos to your writings. It adds precision and depth.

How, though, do we increase our vocabulary?

Without having a sufficient size, we don’t have much to draw from. My answer is to write down unfamiliar words in a notebook. I’m admittedly not always consistent, but I have begun to do this while reading. When I see a word I don’t know, I look it up, and then write it down. It doesn’t have to be a word I don’t know, actually, just something unfamiliar or unusual. Such a word sometimes gives the air of familiarity when an expert writer places it into a flawless context, yet alone it is actually unfamiliar or unusual. So look it up and write it down.

A thesaurus is a useful tool, though it’s inadequate. Like randomly searching a dictionary, a thesaurus unlikely will help you find a word that represents a complex idea you want to convey but which you cannot simplify to a specific word. That’s why you need to build your mind’s vocabulary.

“Green-Eyed Logic Puzzle”

The following is from TEDEd:

This “green-eyed logic puzzle” kind of reminds me of a logic joke I’ve seen.

Four logicians walk in a bar. The host asks the question, “Do you all want a drink?” The first logician says, “I don’t know.” The second logician says, “I don’t know.” The third logician says, “I don’t know.” And the fourth logician says, “Yes!”

The fourth logician can respond with a “Yes” because if logician one, two, or three didn’t want a drink, their answer would have been a “No.” And if the fourth logician didn’t want a drink, he could have said “No.”

(Here we have three, not four, logicians!)

The “green-eyed logic puzzle,” to be sure, is more complicated than the bar joke.

Yet when you consider two prisoners, the puzzle is not too hard. It just seems hard when you have 100 people. So, when it comes to these problems, it is always a good idea to attempt to simplify it and then try to solve it. And if you can do that, you can extrapolate and tackle the seemingly more difficult problem with its greater numbers involved.

In the easy case, since it is known that “at least one person has green eyes,” person A and person B can figure out things and leave on the second night. That’s because person A knows that if person B left the first night, that would only be because B saw that A is non-green. That didn’t happen! Ergo, person A realizes that he must have green eyes.

The same logic applies to person B. Ergo, person B realizes that he must have green eyes. As the number of people increase, the number of days increases proportionally as it takes as many days to observe as there are people so as to watch their actions, and those actions reveal needed information. With three people, it takes three nights. With n people, it takes n nights. We can see this modeled after induction by generalizing from two people to n people.

The video references David Lewis (who is famous in philosophy for his ideas about “possible worlds” in logic) and suggests that the “common knowledge” being shared to everyone at once makes a difference. It makes a difference because now everyone is keeping track of everyone else based on the “common knowledge.” In other words, the video suggests, for everyone to keep track of everyone during these days with a success rate of 100 is for the simultaneity of watching at that point when the “common knowledge” was broadcasted.

“Contradictions are Bad!”

Amateur Logician videos are mostly on YouTube.

Below are a few of the exceptions from TikTok.

Aristotle was right when he argued that accepting contradictions as true leads to utter incoherence and madness. Contradictions lead to bad thinking. Out of a contradiction, we can “prove” the moon is made out of cheese, that black is white and white is black, and that four is not identical to four.

Logic is truly a part of the liberal arts; it’s not just mathematics. We can read better and write better when we understand logic better. There are many good reasons to learn logic!

Book Recommendations:
The Logic of Real Arguments by Alec Fisher
Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft
Logic as a Liberal Art by Rollen Edward Houser
Basic Logic by Raymond J. McCall
The Trivium: The Liberal Arts of Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric by Sister Miriam Joseph
Introduction to Logic by Andrew H. Bachhuber

© Copyright 2024. AmateurLogician.com. All Rights Reserved.
AmateurLogician.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.